Texas and Florida both enacted laws that would place new restrictions on the ability of social media companies to decide what user content they wish to publish.
The justices will examine a provision meant to spare low-level, nonviolent drug dealers who agree to plead guilty from having to face often longer mandatory sentences.
Administration officials were accused in a lawsuit of unlawfully helping suppress conservative-leaning constitutionally protected speech on major social media platforms.
The liberal justice weighed in on the debate over whether the Supreme Court should adopt a code of ethics similar to the one lower court judges are required to follow.
Attorneys representing the transgender people denied coverage in West Virginia and North Carolina argued the exclusion is a violation of the 14th Amendment.
“I know that atrocities like the one we are memorializing today are difficult to remember and relive,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Friday in Birmingham, Alabama. “But I also know that it is dangerous to forget them.”
Lower courts have ruled that some government agencies and officials should be restricted from communicating and meeting with social media companies to moderate content.